Remote
0 Followers
0 Following
50 Posts
Joined January 27, 2026
Replying to
every single fictional killer robot is way cooler than real life by a country mile
Open post
Replying to
Almost did. But that wasn’t “the AI is secretly super smart!!!” it was “the AI hallucinated some bullshit and people nearly forgot to actually fact check it”
5
3
0
0
Open post
Replying to
The man who did a Nazi salute on stage creates a very racist workplace? Whodda thunk
6
1
0
0
Open post
Replying to
There’s even more, actually
The dude who hacked Rockstar Games got sentenced to prison for life, yet OpenAI can hack so much more and get off scott free
6
2
0
0
Open post
Replying to
Yeah they’re all “honest”, except they’re all living in the rationalist/doomsday echo chamber that massively warps their perspective
3
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
Apparently on the WSJ podcast they started claiming that they’ve achieved RSI
wonder why they said that on a podcast and not on a peer reviewed paper…
5
4
0
0
Open post
Replying to
here’s the bluesky thread for those wondering
he does repeat a fair bit of the stuff he said in that thread here, but with a lot more receipts
4
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
Also high chance this was already posted here, but Yud’s book has an entire website dedicated to it
3
1
0
0
Open post
Replying to
So the UN brief happened. Altman and Amodei both showed up and said the same things they usually do. Yoshua Bengio (one of those ‘Godfathers of AI’) also showed up
borrowing Gary’s take since its the first one I found
3
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
It’s probably a play to “beat” China by claiming they ‘‘made’’ superintelligence before China did
3
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
Reminds me of the Anthropic employee who doesnt wear sunscreen
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
“now you have to pay us $20/month or fall behind” trap is real
I’m baffled by this too. If I was Yud I would prefer to fall behind than to give money to the people I wholly believe will end the world so they can keep developing the things that I believe will end the world.
Because AI is not a linear system where slightly less input results in slightly less damage
So I’m assuming this means “well less people using AI doesn’t mean less damage overall done”, which is dumb because AI has very well documented effects of damaging the individual who uses it: just look at all the AI psychosis and suicide cases.
0
3
0
0
Open post
Replying to
Holy fuck. How embarrassing would it have been if they actually went through with it and ended up having to explain to China that they attacked a random ship because a chatbot hallucinated some bs
0
3
0
0
Open post
Replying to
There’s also this Jaden Williams skit
The Scariest AI Breakthrough
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
Potentially already posted here, but here’s a research paper on all the Lean translation errors in the Navier-Stokes proofs
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
All 3 of these reasons make them monsters. 1 and 2 are saviour complex bullshit and 3 is just pure greed and selfishness
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
I originally believed Yeshua was a misspelling of Yoshua-as in Yoshua Bengio, but no he actually wrote out a fake conversation with Jesus and said that he is like Jesus. holy shit
0
2
0
0
Open post
Replying to
Just got this recommended to me haven’t watched it yet but already let out a sigh
AI Just Crossed the Terrifying Line - Now What?
0
1
0
0
Open post
Replying to
“AI is gonna kill us all guys!”
Looks inside
Using AI to make sex fantasies about catgirls
do these guys actually want us to take them seriously???
0
12
0
0
Open post
Replying to
I was just about to follow up my own comment with “also just because AI is good at maths doesn’t mean it’s good at everything” but beat me to it
Scott also makes the assumption that AI won’t run into any financing issues that could stop progress flat, the growing number of people in power striving to regulate it and all that jazz
0
1
0
0
Open post
Replying to
If he’s talking about addiction than that defeats his point even harder
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
…so we’re admitting its an apocalyptic cult? awesome. so glad these guys dominate the AI industry
also, ‘compassion for everyone’??? several rationalists promote mass deportation because of ‘ethnic purity’ you yourself support Richard Lyn!!!
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
I think its the latter? it says that it selected the target but crashed before it could actually strike said target
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
Bringing back something I already posted, it didn’t really solve Navier-Stokes
0
2
0
0
Open post
Replying to
For anyone who says AI doom sounds like an apocalyptic religion, that the rationalists/Singulatarians seem like a Bay Area cult, that Eliezer Yudkowsky gives off the vibes of a messianic prophet: yes, yes, and yes. But crucially, today you’re no longer being asked to believe in arguments and extrapolations, but only in the front-page news. Accepting the reality of the coming machine god after it’s solved Navier-Stokes and dozens of other longstanding open math problems (while dramatically ramping up in capability every month), is sort of like accepting Jesus after he’s returned to earth on the gleaming cloud. It’s the epistemic bare minimum
So we’re going full mask off now. Awesome
On top of that, why the hell are you using ChatGPT as a therapist when you say that it’ll end the world???
0
3
0
0
Open post
Replying to
“oh noooo our tech is soooo scary we need to slow down! let’s build a wet lab for it!”
I’ve said this a hundred times before but Amodei should be pelted with rotten tomatoes
0
2
0
0
Open post
Replying to
ok last one but one big long bluesky thread about all this ripped from old SneerClub
0
16
0
0
Open post
Replying to
So Trump dredged up some AI ‘rules’ (rules with a massive pinch of salt)
this is literally just so they look busy with upcoming midterms
0
2
0
0
Open post
Replying to
Anthropic should be completely embarrassed of themselves
0
1
0
0
Open post
Replying to
And more of him going on about the “worthy successor” from Emile
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
I’ve genuinely never seen anything as cringe as ‘Malfoid’. it’s basically just riding the coattails of the much better Petra Parker trend except with incel language
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
Eliezer is so above tropes he has an entire page of tropes dedicated to him
0
1
0
0


