← Feed

Posts

• View post

  @nuintari as someone who learned the inner workings of both protocols during my education, i do agree. not only is IPv6 not more complicated, it simplifies a lot of things too. even if we were to still be using NAT in the exact same way, there's still many areas where it's just simpler and better. it is faster on home networks where IPv4 is not used too, so everyone wins, really.

• View post

  @mollysinless while I understand being frustrated with a company, and even straight up disagreeing with them on every level, why spread lies and misinformation about them? What you have written here is simply not true. In many other devices, there is no battery upgrade path at all. That makes this not pointless, even if it was too expensive (but you're not required to do so either). The old parts are not useless, even if you yourself find no use for them.

• View post

  @halcy a good C compiler will do what you ask of it exactly or better. if a C compiler does not do this, it is a bug.

• View post

  @joeress@mastodon.social im just making a point that X11, the legacy protocol, is fortunately being kept working for applications that are not

• View post

  @joeress@mastodon.social not xwayland though

• View post

  @joeress@mastodon.social well that's probably being left behind too lol

• View post

  @BleepingComputer@infosec.exchange sure. one of the few. of hundreds that still exist.

• View post

  @Alrecenk@peoplemaking.games is it a const* or a const* const?

• View post

  @f1veg0ldenrAyz@layer8.space maybe the people that are this mad at the devs are the very people who would really like to use GNOME though?