I mean, “democratically elected” does a lot of heavy lifting in countries that are choked out by fascist governance and fear-mongering media. “Sovereignty” also has a weird way of being used to weaponize self-determination into surveillance-state policing and xenophobic policy. Sure, but since we’re talking about hypothetical and fictional situations, I’m asking why a not real place that actually does democracy well and isn’t dragging a legacy of being shitty behind it allowed to manage its own affairs and territory under this “no borders” idea. And you’re dodging the question I’ve asked, which is open borders in practice are a mess. Why is it that a French citizen traveling to Germany or Spain is considered benign, but a Libyan citizen traveling to Germany or Spain is considered part of a “flood” that has some kind of existential threat to the locals? Why does Libya’s dogshit government get raised as a reason why this Libyan visitor can’t stay at my hotel or eat at my restaurant or work in my office? Uhh… you do know the EU exists, right? Germany, Spain and France all have treaties in place under the EU and EEC that say they have freedom of movement, labor, and ownership of property among each other’s countries as EU citizens. People from Libya aren’t EU citizens, so laws granting transitive rights between EU member countries don’t include Libya or anyone from Libya as Libya isn’t part of the EU. If Libya joined the EU, then they would. Plus, have you not seen recent complaints from Italians and Portuguese that they’re being overrun with other Europeans and Americans anyway? How many Brits learned the hard way what Brexit meant when they lost residency in Spain? You also seem to forget that Europe used to have hard borders. French people used to need permission to go to Spain, and vice versa. Spanish farmers, some possibly still alive today, needed special letters to tend to fields in France back in the 1960s. Does being born in Country A stain someone’s soul in a way that makes them incompatible with Country B? Not at all, but why does someone being a human give them a right to go anywhere and do anything? It also seems like no one has thought out the true dangers of economic imperialism with no borders or governments. Holy shit, you really trust social media and advertising to be left unchecked? A lot of peple would 100% move to the Wal-Mart corporate town and condos. That’s also exactly how you get things like the insane Broligarchy Network State stuff. Highly developed pockets of society that rampantly exert force on neighbors to extract resources. You know, like people used to do to each other during the era of early history and pre-history.