You leave out how this system could exist in reality as an afterthought and only argue that it is more morally better according to your own form of deontological ethics based on “anarchist principles.” You are too focused on arguing that your hypothetical future system is better than capitalism, which, yeah, sure it is, but how do you get there beyond just vague “more mutual aid”? That’s really the most important part actually, not the principles, it’s how our current capitalist reality divided by imperialism and patriarchy can transform into a new system that resolves its contradictions. If you can’t look at your real surroundings and articulate a coherent string of logic for how your anarchist system can come to exist from this starting point.