2026-04-23 19:44 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@Sovereign@nicecrew.digital 2026-04-23 19:46
@FF777@shitposter.world @DrBtc@nicecrew.digital @jb@nicecrew.digital @cjd@pkteerium.xyz This is the double edge sword of "compliance" at all costs. This is why we have to really support projects that have technology that supplements personal sovereignty as much as possible.
-
@Sovereign@nicecrew.digital 2026-04-23 19:48
@FF777@shitposter.world @DrBtc@nicecrew.digital @jb@nicecrew.digital @cjd@pkteerium.xyz The problem with not having a CBDC though is that you have a harder time ensuring that peg. There are plenty of examples of "stable"coins destabilizing and making a bunch of people lose money. Although I fully get the CBDC concerns, most people who beat on that anti-CBDC drum aren't providing solutions to pegged assets losing their peg lol. I'm acknowledging the concerns but also mentioning that just throwing fire on CBDCs doesn't actually bring much to the discussion.
-
@DrBtc@nicecrew.digital 2026-04-23 20:43
Yes that was Terra/luna but back in 2022 it collapsed when the market melted down. It had no physical money backing it up but was an algorithm system to maintain the peg. It entered a death spiral and about $50b got wiped out. So now we're stuck with centralized dollar pegs.