@GeofCox@climatejustice.social
2026-08-16 08:19 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@Colman@mastodon.ie 2026-08-16 09:45
@GeofCox@climatejustice.social or they need to update their cooling system.
-
@Npars01@mstdn.social 2026-08-16 11:02
@GeofCox@climatejustice.social There's another reason to revisit nuclear energy. As The Moneyed orchestrate a profitable world war for themselves, nuclear power stations become military targets. Look at how often Putin has attacked Ukraine's nuclear power stations. If Trump's fossil fuel donors, both foreign & domestic, get their way, the globe gets sliced into spheres of influence with Putin getting Europe. Distributed energy generation is prudent strategy because it removes leverage. https://www.desmog.com/2025/03/14/heritage-foundation-project-2025-allies-mcc-ordo-iuris-discuss-dismantling-the-eu-european-union/
-
@quinn@social.circl.lu 2026-08-16 14:42
@GeofCox@climatejustice.social I don't agree - building more doesn't make sense, but until there are distributed grid scale batteries, along with more distributed solar and wind, maintenance and operation of existing nuclear is vital for making the transition away from fossil fuels logistically.*But* even more, culturally. People need to trust renewables, and that takes time.