@PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
2026-10-13 06:55 UTC
Replies (1)
-
@BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 2026-10-13 07:28
it always results in the accumulation of wealth in few hands, who can then use that power to subvert democracy and get their way. But that’s not really capitalisms fault. We’ve seen higher degrees of inequalities in socialist countries and feudal economies could be claimed the inequality is a part of the design. It’s due to a lack of government rules. Capitalism brings with it a complete alienation, communities don’t own their land, people don’t own their work It opens up for the possibility of either owning your work or owning the value (wage) of your work. 2 millennia ago, when everyone worked in their own workshops and sold to the market, that was ultimately also a capitalistic economy. Communities now can own their land, because everything is a commodity. Under other systems, the government, noble or other highly ranked owns the land and leases it out - We could argue that’s still happening under capitalism, through property taxes. I’m curious if you can expand on the alienation. That’s an incredibly offensive claim Yet you’re not highlighting any, because capitalism is a tad too efficient. The alterations we seek out to do, does not stop capitalism; Just changes the goals of it and the late stage setup to move more power/capital back to the people.