2026-10-12 18:36 UTC
Replies (9)
-
@shweddy@lemmy.world 2026-10-12 18:42
Those yandex servers must be back up
-
@CrateredMoon@lemmy.today 2026-10-12 22:37
Fascists are trying to suppress/dissuade/undermine the vote… all im sayin.
-
@1Malayali@lemmy.ml 2026-10-13 05:07
Voting maybe part of escalation. Unless the fascists are able to edit the votes. But that would also be on escalation. But voting alone may not be safe, if you are dealing with fascists as they will ready for escalation(may even be wishing for it). You would need your own orgs, preferably communist/socialist orgs since they were one among the most effective against fascists based on history.
-
@wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 2026-10-13 06:07
Serious question. What is your actionable alternative? Actionable as in something you do
-
@UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2026-10-13 13:18
Faucet should be labeled capitalism
-
@expletivedeleted@lemmy.zip 2026-10-13 14:40
It’s the fucks who didn’t vote that got Trump elected.
-
@BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 2026-10-14 00:17
Something I had forgotten I argued last electoral cycle that this post somehow reminded me: People say (or said) we have to - or had to now - vote for Kamala Harris because she’d lose without our votes. They would also say (said) a third party vote was useless and the same as voting for Trump, since the party would not be able to win. It is the same that is now being argued for the democratic party in general. Yet when I pointed out that since we aren’t voting for genociders like the democrats and therefore their votes are wasted on a candidate thats sure to lose, so they have to vote for the party I want them to vote for, if we are to beat Trump, then that argument is somehow faulty to them. Odd how that is. They can see the issue with the reasoning as long as it does not benefit them.
-
@myyass@lemmy.world 2026-10-14 02:57
The real solution is boycotting a “cuntry” that isn’t real.
-
@pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-10-14 14:07
Vote is good, go vote.