Post by @boud@framapiaf.org

2026-10-26 18:05 UTC

@mildpeach@mstdn.social @josch@floss.social @Lamuchan@eldritch.cafe In the ongoing discussion [1], it looks like there's rough consensus to make the LLM NEW-queue reviews at least opt-out, and preferably opt-in. It's bad that someone thought that they could impose this without getting any objections, but it looks like there are plenty of objections (only one consequentalist claim - "but it works" - that I can see). [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2026/10/threads.html#00263

Replies (2)

@josch@floss.social 2026-10-26 21:12

@boud@framapiaf.org Yes, the DFSG team might implement some changes after having received quite a bit of feedback on this topic now. But even if they change it, I worry about the long-term situation. If I start having to worry "what problem will it be today?" when I wake up, then this hobby will become more dread and less fun and then I will just put my priorities elsewhere. @mildpeach@mstdn.social @Lamuchan@eldritch.cafe

Open ##5449958
@gbargoud@masto.nyc 2026-10-27 06:58

@boud@framapiaf.org @mildpeach@mstdn.social @josch@floss.social @Lamuchan@eldritch.cafe The problem is that we've all seen this trajectory before with LLM "features": * Force it on everyone * Make it opt out after some backlash * Find ways to invalidate the opting out or make the opt out path unsupported/deprecated

Open ##5449960