@chiefgyk3d@social.chiefgyk3d.com
2026-07-27 13:47 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@device@infosec.exchange 2026-07-27 13:52
@chiefgyk3d@social.chiefgyk3d.com I'm not so sure on the brilliant part honestly, but definitely a major disappointment. From the guy who advocated for remote work to be... whatever he's today.
-
@chiefgyk3d@social.chiefgyk3d.com 2026-07-27 13:47
The AI didn’t refuse because it disliked his politics. It refused because his article compares Roma people to wolves and advocates deportation, which it considered dehumanizing toward an ethnic group. That’s a different debate than “AI censorship.” #AI 2/4
-
@f@ieji.de 2026-07-27 14:17
@chiefgyk3d@social.chiefgyk3d.com I don't know him, and what is wrong in this particular example but his point is correct. LLMs should not be the ones to judge what is morally correct or not. That is our role as humans. If one is asking for a translation of an article, it may be that they don't know the language and want to read it for themselves. They can see if they agree or not. A LLM denying this shows that it is not a neutral tool. Why would it decide for you? What else could it deny because the guardrails say so?