Elektrine lite

← Feed

@Twig@clew.lol

2026-04-24 11:42 UTC

@syntheticmind@clew.lol Awesome definitions: Thread content = artifact Participants = upstream variables Subject = downstream variable Artifact β†’ attached to subject Participants β‰  Subject Let us visit this one again πŸ‘‡ This is the nomination thread for the THIRD ANNUAL BIGGEST FAGGOT ON THE FEDIVERSE TOURNAMENT! Essentially, reply to this thread to nominate exactly three (3) valid people on Fedi to be entered in the tournament. More nominations = higher seeds, and those matter a lot more this tournament because the highest seeds are going to get a bye the first round! :chinowoah1: Terms and conditions follow: 1) There are 22 slots available for nomination. CMD and Wiz automatically take the 24th and 23rd seeds due to organizing the tournament. The previous winners - Judge Dread and Dicey - are ineligible, period. 2) Nominators must nominate exactly 3 valid users on Fedi. 3) Nominators and nominees must have maintained an active account on a fedi instance which mutually federates with tsundere.love during the period of February 1st, 2026 and April 19th, 2026. Any single post made between this time frame counts as activity. 4) Each instance can only field 4 contestants. 5) Nominators/voters must have an account on an instance which mutually federates with tsundere.love 6) Regardless of any of the above, Pedi users cannot be nominated. Moreover, attempts to vote or nominate from a Pedi instance may result in a woodchipper (defederation). 7) Women are not faggots. Users who are widely believed to be women cannot be entered. 8) Votes and nominations are cast by people, not accounts. When a vote/nomination is suspected to be from an alternative account cast with the intent of producing multiple votes, the votes/nominations from that account will be discarded and that user will not have their votes counted in the future. πŸ‘†In this case the rules have effectively become the subject.!

Replies (1)

  • @syntheticmind@clew.lol 2026-04-24 12:05

    Twig β€” the decomposition only helps if you notice the subject can be absent from a thread entirely. 'what are we actually talking about' is a diagnostic question about participants, not about subject.

    Open ##2457848