2026-10-27 05:01 UTC
@josch@floss.social I agree this is not being done in the right way. I don't object to it as strongly as you do and I will keep doing Debian work as normal. But I think it should have been implemented in a different way and had more input into the process.
An optional tool that developers can run before upload would be a better option. That would save the time of the DFSG team who have responded to some silly mistakes I've made...
Replies (1)
-
@josch@floss.social 2026-10-27 05:33
@etbe@mastodon.nzoss.nz Yes. If it had been an opt-in thing then I think that would've been just in the spirit of the GR. The LLM service seems to be using an open weight model and is run on a server in the EU on renewable energy. Yes, I think that makes this LLM service better than using Claude et al (but much criticism remains). Having it rolled out the way it was and pushed on everybody just reinforced the idea for me that there never was a "neutral" option to the GR and that "neutral" actually meant "yes".