Elektrine lite

← Feed

@ki4jgt@feddit.org

2026-10-15 17:19 UTC

Why don't movie ratings just have letters indicating objectionable material? LVNST would be much more informative than “Rated R,” or, “PG-13.” L - Language V - Violence N - Nudity S - Sex T - Tobacco use

Replies (13)

  • @DagwoodIII@piefed.social 2026-10-15 17:33

    I’d guess the idea is that as an adult you can handle anything you see in a movie. For instance, I saw the movie where 99% of humanity has died, and people are losing their minds when the hero has to put down a doggie.

    Open ##5049830

  • @mushroommunk@lemmy.today 2026-10-15 17:34

    And an “A” for animal abuse. But seriously, movie ratings are a joke and basically no one pays attention to them that I know.

    Open ##5049846

  • @bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2026-10-15 17:42

    There’s a good documentary called This Film Is Not Yet Rated and issues with the existing rating system. For example a gay sex scene gets an NC-17 but straight one would get an R rating. If memory serves, they exist to rate the movies to prevent government regulation and to protect the studios which they’re rating.

    Open ##5049885

  • @sanguinepar@lemmy.world 2026-10-15 19:00

    Depends what ratings are intended to do - if they are just to be informative for potential viewers then the kind of system you propose sounds good. But, if the main purpose is to legally restrict access based on age, such ratings wouldn’t really do the job. Plus, of course, there’s quite a range within each category - language could mean something as innocuous as “bum”, or something as deeply offensive as “Belgium” or “Barbara Streisand”. I suppose you could have age ratings for each subcategory - L18, V12, N0, S0, D15, but it’d start to get complicated pretty fast. Plus, presumably, whatever the highest of those ratings was would still be the overall rating. At which point we’re back where we started.

    Open ##5050806

  • TV content ratings do this

    Open ##5051825

  • @MaxLemminist@lemmy.ml 2026-10-15 20:35

    LOL at blasphemy.

    Open ##5051894

  • What would blasphemy include? There are a lot of religions, and if you include even the smaller ones, I expect a lot of blasphemy to pass trough unrated. For example, if I remember correctly, some teachings consider things like reanimated skeletons to be blasphemous. Also, aren’t you going to add “(H) horror” to your list?

    Open ##5059850

  • @HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 2026-10-16 10:29

    “Telly Tubbies”? lol it’s Teletubbies

    Open ##5060020

  • @DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 2026-10-16 12:40

    The reason is that the MPAA is a private industry org created to prevent movies from being regulated in the US in such a way that they’d have to create an informative content system.

    Open ##5061402

  • @Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2026-10-17 00:29

    Blasphemy?

    Open ##5072238

  • @lemuria@lemmy.ml 2026-10-17 01:16

    The Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB) of the Philippines has a similar system to this for SPG (Strong Parental Guidance) TV shows, with TLKSHD for Themes, Language, Karahasan (Tagalog for “violence”), Sex, Horror, and Drugs. However, I think the MTRCB needs to stop existing and go pound sand. Their decisions have been… questionable.

    Open ##5072886

  • @pineapple@lemmy.ml 2026-10-17 04:01

    You need a W for woke.

    Open ##5078847

  • @muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2026-10-18 03:19

    D - death S - sunsnu K - the klan R - Elon would like to a bit too much 18 - trump would like to a bit too much

    Open ##5096473